U.S. Supreme Court justices and federal judges must now provide greater public disclosure of any free trips, meals or gifts they receive under new regulations adopted at the urging of lawmakers and judicial transparency advocates.
made public on Tuesday by Democratic U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, who has argued for broader ethics reforms at the Supreme Court.
He and other Democrats in Congress have also introduced legislation that would require the Supreme Court to adopt a, strengthen recusal standards for judges and bolster financial disclosure requirements. Whitehouse, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said the judiciary's disclosure rules had long been more relaxed than other branches of government, particularly when it came to defining what constituted "personal hospitality" that judges did not have to disclose.
Österreich Neuesten Nachrichten, Österreich Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
Supreme Court justices under new ethics disclosures on trips, other giftsSupreme Court justices and all federal judges must provide a fuller public accounting of free trips, meals and other gifts they accept from corporations or organizations, according to revised regulations quietly adopted this month.
Weiterlesen »
US Supreme Court justices get stiffer rules for reporting free trips, giftsU.S. Supreme Court justices and federal judges will be required to provide greater public disclosure of any free trips, meals or gifts they receive under new regulations adopted at the urging of lawmakers and judicial transparency advocates.
Weiterlesen »
Immigration fraud case brings tough First Amendment questions to the Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in a case about whether a federal law that prohibits inducing unlawful immigration violates the First Amendment.
Weiterlesen »
US Supreme Court examines law against encouraging illegal immigrationThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday will consider whether a federal law that made it a crime for a person to encourage illegal immigration violates constitutional free speech protections in a case involving a California man who deceived immigrants through a phony 'adult adoption' program.
Weiterlesen »
ACLU asks US Supreme Court to review N.H.'s criminal defamation statuteThe law's critics allege it is a tool for those in positions of power, including members of law enforcement, to silence those who speak out against them. The statute is also unevenly applied, the ACLU contends.
Weiterlesen »
Explainer: What happens if the US Supreme Court bans affirmative action?The U.S. Supreme Court is weighing whether colleges can continue to consider race as part of their admissions decisions, a practice commonly known as affirmative action.
Weiterlesen »