US Supreme Court hears arguments in case that involves a form of the f-word.
Patrick T. Fallon / ReutersGet breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.WASHINGTON — A bare majority of the U.S. Supreme Court seemed prepared Monday to allow a trademark for a California clothing brand that uses a form of the f-word. But the justices didn't appear very happy about the prospect.
Government attorneys concluded that Brunetti's brand name was phonetically equivalent to the past tense of what a Justice Department lawyer called"the paradigmatic profane word in our culture." As a result of that earlier decision, Justice Department lawyer Malcolm Stewart told the justices that the government would now likely narrow its application so that only terms that are obscene or shocking would be barred.
Stewart also said the law does not restrict speech, because Brunetti can call his clothing whatever he wants. He just can't get a trademark."The law isn't a limitation on speech," Stewart said."It's a limitation on a government benefit."
Österreich Neuesten Nachrichten, Österreich Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
F-word: Supreme Court struggles with law blocking trademark protection in cases of vulgarityThe Supreme Court expressed disdain for the public display of vulgarity Monday, but seemed reluctant to use federal trademark law against it.
Weiterlesen »
F-words and T-shirts: U.S. Supreme Court weighs foul language trademarksIn the staid world of the U.S. Supreme Court, where decorum and etiquette are pr...
Weiterlesen »
F-words and T-shirts: U.S. Supreme Court weighs foul language trademarksIn the staid world of the U.S. Supreme Court, where decorum and etiquette are prized and silence is enforced by court police, the F-word could create quite a stir. Brunetti has tried to calm concern about the potential for foul language during arguments in the ornate courtroom. At issue is a provision
Weiterlesen »
In 'FUCT' fashion brand case, justices avoid saying wordWASHINGTON (AP) — None of the Supreme Court's justices wanted to say the four-letter word. The high court was discussing a trademark case Monday involving a Los Angeles-based fashion brand...
Weiterlesen »
‘Kick Kavanaugh off campus': Students decry George Mason’s decision to hire Supreme Court justiceThe Supreme Court justice, whose nomination became a flashpoint in the MeToo movement, has been hired by the Antonin Scalia Law School to teach a summer course in England on the origins of the U.S. Constitution.
Weiterlesen »
How to say the 'R-word': bank executives grapple with recession talkExecutives at the largest U.S. banks are grappling with how to best talk about t...
Weiterlesen »
Morning Update: Who Doesn't Love A Good Cry In The MorningA record number of family apprehensions, the protests in Sudan, to catch a colleague. Your BuzzFeed News newsletter, April 10.
Weiterlesen »
He wants to trademark a brand name that sounds like the F-word. The Supreme Court is listening.First Amendment case challenges prohibitions on registering “scandalous” titles.
Weiterlesen »