The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a ban on gun attachments that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns violates federal law
, the gun attachments that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns, violates federal law.
The Supreme Court already is weighing a challenge to another federal law that seeks to keep guns away from people under domestic violence restraining orders, a case that stems fromThe new case is not about the Second Amendment right to “keep and bear arms,” but rather whether the Trump administration followed federal law in changing the bump stock regulation.
Most of the rifles were fitted with bump stock devices and high-capacity magazines. A total of 58 people were killed in the shooting, and two died later. Hundreds were injured. A shooter must maintain constant forward pressure on the weapon with the non-shooting hand and constant pressure on the trigger with the trigger finger, according to court records.in January that Congress would have to change federal law to ban bump stocks.
Österreich Neuesten Nachrichten, Österreich Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
Suspect in rapper Tupac Shakur's killing pleads not guilty in Las Vegas courtA former gang member charged in the 1996 murder of hip-hop star Tupac Shakur pleaded not guilty on Thursday in a Las Vegas court.
Weiterlesen »
Supreme Court will rule on ban on rapid-fire gun bump stocksThe Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a ban on gun attachments that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns violates federal law. The justices said Friday they'll hear arguments next year over a gun bump stocks regulation the Justice Department implemented after the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting.
Weiterlesen »
The Supreme Court seems likely to rule against 'Trump too small' trademarkThe Supreme Court has signaled that it would rule against a man who wants to trademark the suggestive phrase “Trump too small.”
Weiterlesen »
Supreme Court appears skeptical of allowing 'Trump Too Small' trademarkThe Supreme Court appeared likely to leave in place a decision from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office rejecting a trademark for the phrase 'Trump Too Small.'
Weiterlesen »
Supreme Court Justice Bails on Case Right After It StartsJustice Samuel Alito seemingly bailed on his vote in the case over a California lawyer's effort to trademark the phrase 'Trump too small.'
Weiterlesen »