The order, which had no publicly noted dissent by any of the Court's justices, means that the special master will not be allowed to review classified documents.
Trump's emergency request, which was filed on October 4, in a brief order that read:"The application to vacate the stay entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on September 21, 2022, presented to Justice Thomas and by him referred to the Court is denied."
Former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally at Legacy Sports USA on October 9 in Mesa, Arizona. The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday sided with the U.S. Department of Justice by denying a request from Trump to allow a special master to review the classified documents that were seized from his Mar-a-Lago estate in August., means that the special master will not be allowed to review the classified documents, according to CNN.
The DOJ, which is currently investigating Trump's alleged mishandling of classified documents with sensitive information, asked the Supreme Court to deny the former president's request. In a 34-page document, the DOJ asked the Supreme Court to reject the request and keep the 100 classified documents out of the special master's reach since Trump didn't clarify how he would be"harmed" by the appeals court decision, also adding that his arguments about jurisdiction lacked merit.
"He does not acknowledge, much less attempt to rebut, the court of appeals' conclusion that the district court's order was a serious and unwarranted intrusion on the Executive Branch's authority to control the use and distribution of extraordinarily sensitive government records," the DOJ wrote, saying that"the application should be denied."
Österreich Neuesten Nachrichten, Österreich Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
Biden calls Supreme Court more of an 'advocacy group' than 'even-handed' courtPresident Joe Biden is ratcheting up his criticism of the Supreme Court, claiming it is acting less like an impartial judicial institution and more like an 'advocacy group.'
Weiterlesen »
Indiana Supreme Court to review abortion lawsuit after lower court froze near-total banThe Indiana Supreme Court has announced it will take jurisdiction over a lawsuit that put a temporary hold to the state's near-total abortion ban.
Weiterlesen »
Arizona abortions won't stop for a month while case proceedsLegal abortions that restarted in Arizona this week after a court blocked enforcement of a pre-statehood ban will be able to continue for at least five weeks while an appeals court considers the case. A schedule set Tuesday for Planned Parenthood and the Arizona attorney general's office lawyers to file their legal briefs in the case means the Arizona Court of Appeals can't decide the case until at least Nov. 17. The appeals court blocked enforcement of the Civil War-era law on Friday, reversing at least for now a Sept. 23 ruling from a judge in Tucson.
Weiterlesen »
Court overturns Mount Vernon woman’s conviction for soliciting to kill ex husbandVanessa Valdiglesias LaValle had been found guilty in 2021 for trying to persuade her son to kill his father with rat poison. Valdiglesias LaValle was sentenced to 15 years in prison for the conviction, which will now be sent back to trial court. FOX13
Weiterlesen »
The Onion mounts a defense of parody in Supreme Court amicus briefThe case before the court involves a man arrested after he spoofed the Parma, Ohio, police force in Facebook posts. After his acquittal, he sued the police...
Weiterlesen »
Supreme Court weighs states’ power to control out-of-state products in California pork caseThe Supreme Court struggled Tuesday to draw a line for when a state can regulate commerce beyond its borders in a challenge to a California law directing the care of pigs and hogs used for pork.
Weiterlesen »