People are using ChatGPT and other generative AI to compose letters that have legalese, aiming to intimidate others. Is this allowed? Should it be stopped? Here is the insider scoop.
The development and promulgation of Ethical AI precepts are being pursued to hopefully prevent society from falling into a myriad of AI-inducing traps. For my coverage of the UN AI Ethics principles as devised and supported by nearly 200 countries via the efforts of UNESCO, see
When you sign-up to use a generative AI app such as ChatGPT, you are also agreeing to abide by the posted stipulations. Many people do not realize this and proceed unknowingly to use ChatGPT in ways that they aren’t supposed to undertake. They risk as a minimum being booted off ChatGPT by OpenAI or worse they might end up getting sued.
Under the conditions stated, we would be hard-pressed to seemingly make a convincing argument that any of those instances are demonstrative examples of performing UPL. Note too that ChatGPT is prone to generating essays containing errors, falsehoods, biases, and so-called AI hallucinations. Thus, just because you can get ChatGPT to embellish an essay with legalese does not mean there is any legal soundness within the essay. It could be an utterly vacuous legal rendering. Some or all of the generated content might be entirely legally incorrect and preposterous.
I already covered this in my discourse above, namely that sometimes the ChatGPT app will figure out that a person is asking for legal advice and will refuse to provide said advice. Meanwhile, there are uses of AI for legal advisement that are being devised and used by lawyers themselves, an area of focused coverage on AI and LegalTech that I cover at
The letter might intimidate the landlord and produce the stellar result you are aiming for. Success might be had. That is the smiley face version. Finally, after an hour or two of fumbling around, you get a ChatGPT legalese letter that seems fitting to be sent.They look at it and rather than being intimidated, they laugh at it. The legalese letter is seen as silly and ineffective. It actually makes you look weak and almost like a buffoon.Also, was the time spent toying with ChatGPT worthwhile or a waste of time?There are studies examining whether people might be getting hooked on using generative AI such as ChatGPT .
Later on, the whole matter goes to court. Your prior correspondence becomes part of the issues at trial. The judge sees and reviews your letters. The opposing side attempts to undermine your credibility by arguing that you were being deceitful by using such language.
Österreich Neuesten Nachrichten, Österreich Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
ChatGPT Will See You Now: Doctors Using AI to Answer Patient QuestionsMessaging your doctor? You might receive a response that was drafted with the help of artificial intelligence.
Weiterlesen »
Employee says ChatGPT carries out 80% of his work duties: reportEmployee says ChatGPT carries out 80% of his work duties, which allowed him to take on a 2nd job, report says
Weiterlesen »
What ChatGPT Means for the Finance FunctionWhat does ChatGPT mean for the finance function? Read this Q&A with GartnerFinance expert Mark D. McDonald to learn more: Gartner_inc
Weiterlesen »
WSJ News Exclusive | Europe to ChatGPT: Disclose Your SourcesMakers of artificial-intelligence tools such as ChatGPT would be required to disclose copyright material used in building their systems, according to proposed European Union legislation
Weiterlesen »
Meet ChatGPT’s Right-Wing Alter EgoA programmer is building chatbots with opposing political views to make a point about biased AI. He’s also planning a centrist bot to bridge the divide.
Weiterlesen »
Accounting giant PricewaterhouseCoopers embraces ChatGPT AI, plans $1 billion investmentPricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) plans to invest $1 billion in generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in its US operations over the next three years.
Weiterlesen »