An L.A. judge found the show's original producers were not wrongfully cut out of profits from a deal.
Judge Judy
The case, filed in 2018, was set to go to trial on June 6. Attorneys representing Switzer and Spreckman did not immediately respond to requests for comment on whether they plan to appeal Escalante’s ruling siding with the defense on summary judgment, which effectively ends the case.
Österreich Neuesten Nachrichten, Österreich Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
Judge Judy & CBS Win Battle Over Profits From Sale Of Syndicated Series’ LibraryEXCLUSIVE: Four years after Judith Sheindlin, CBS and others were sued by a producer from the early seasons of the Judge Judy series and the estate of another producer over profits from the big buc…
Weiterlesen »
Federal judge finds Trump, attorney John Eastman likely committed crimes over 2020 electionA federal judge ruled on Monday that former President Donald Trump and John Eastman, a lawyer who advised him on how to overturn the 2020 election, most likely committed felonies, including obstruc…
Weiterlesen »
Opinion: I’m glad Judge Jackson went high when her detractors went lowThe Texas junior senator is right to pose every possible question to Judge Jackson, but a...
Weiterlesen »
Judge sees likely Trump crimes, orders release of emails to Jan. 6 panelA federal judge asserted it is 'more likely than not' that former President Trump committed crimes in his attempt to stop the certification of the 2020 election.
Weiterlesen »
Does the judge in the Sussmann case have a conflict of interest?In the course of an ongoing legal proceeding, when it’s discovered that a defense lawyer, prosecutor or presiding judge’s spouse is representing an individual who might be a witness in the case, is that grounds for recusal?
Weiterlesen »