The IIHS' new testing program assesses automated driving systems' ability to monitor and correct driver behavior, and it looks like there's plenty of progress to be made.
Semi-autonomous driving assistance systems have been around for a while now, but it’s clear automakers need to do more to make sure drivers are still paying attention while their cars do some of the heavy lifting. That’s the message from the, which recently released a new ratings program to assess the safeguards around these systems and how well they prevent misuse.
The organization’s president, David Harkey, said that automation might not be the boon for safety that some had hoped. “Some drivers may feel that partial automation makes long drives easier, but there is little evidence itPerhaps the most critical point out of all of this is the IIHS’ warning that automakers’ marketing buzzwords sometimes cloud the fact that there are no self-driving vehicles.
Österreich Neuesten Nachrichten, Österreich Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
IIHS Gives Poor Rating To Automated Driving Systems From Tesla & 9 Other CompaniesThe latest report from IIHS gives all but one automated driving technology a poor rating, including Tesla's Autopilot and FSD.
Weiterlesen »
IIHS flunks most current semi-autonomous driving systems | Car NewsThe IIHS conducted a new type of test assessing and scoring semi-autonomous driving systems. All but one of the 14 systems flunked. Auto123.
Weiterlesen »
Lexus, Not Tesla, Makes The Best Driver Assistance System, Study FindsIIHS thinks most assistance tech is junk, and even the best-rated Lexus system is only “adequate”
Weiterlesen »
Consumer safety organization finds flaws in partially automated car systemsThe Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has released its first ranking system for partially automated car systems, finding that most of the tested systems performed poorly. The industry claims these systems are safe, but the consumer safety organization argues there is little evidence to support this. Only one system passed the ranking, while eleven were rated poor and two were marginal.
Weiterlesen »
Poor Safety Ratings for Tesla's Autopilot and Other Self-Driving SystemsThe Insurance Institute for Highway Safety gave poor safety ratings to several self-driving systems, including Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving functions. This raises concerns about the safety of automated features on highways. The assessment covered 14 partial driving automation features from BMW, Ford, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Tesla, and Volvo. None of the systems received a good rating, with the Lexus LS Teammate system being rated as the best with an acceptable rating. The GMC Sierra and Nissan Ariya offered self-driving systems with marginal ratings. The IIHS emphasized the need for driver involvement and attention despite the systems being marketed as self-driving.
Weiterlesen »
A Drug Wellness program is hoping to keep families together across PA countiesThousands of children are in the Pennsylvania foster care system. Data shows parental drug abuse is the number one reason why children are placed into the syste
Weiterlesen »