Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize property

Sonia Sotomayor Nachrichten

Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize property
U.S. NewsWashington NewsBrett Kavanaugh
  • 📰 ksatnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 18 sec. here
  • 5 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 53%

A divided Supreme Court has ruled that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.

FILE - The U.S. Supreme Court is seen, April 25, 2024, in Washington. ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.

In a dissent for the liberal members of the court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that civil forfeiture is “vulnerable to abuse” because police departments often have a financial incentive to keep the property. Sutton had loaned her car to a friend. Police in Leesburg, Alabama seized it when they arrested him for trafficking methamphetamine.

Wir haben diese Nachrichten zusammengefasst, damit Sie sie schnell lesen können. Wenn Sie sich für die Nachrichten interessieren, können Sie den vollständigen Text hier lesen. Weiterlesen:

ksatnews /  🏆 442. in US

U.S. News Washington News Brett Kavanaugh

Österreich Neuesten Nachrichten, Österreich Schlagzeilen

Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.

Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize propertyDivided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize propertyA divided Supreme Court has ruled that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
Weiterlesen »

Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize propertyDivided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize propertyA divided Supreme Court has ruled that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners
Weiterlesen »

Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize propertyDivided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize propertyA divided Supreme Court has ruled that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
Weiterlesen »

Supreme Court sharply divided over enforcing municipal homeless camping banSupreme Court sharply divided over enforcing municipal homeless camping banThe Supreme Court appears deeply conflicted over a city's ban on homeless camping in public spaces that is meant to fight the growing homelessness crisis.
Weiterlesen »

Supreme Court appears divided over homeless ban and rights of the unhousedSupreme Court appears divided over homeless ban and rights of the unhousedThe decision in an Oregon homelessness case, to be released in June, could be the most far-reaching judgment on the rights of the unhoused in decades.
Weiterlesen »

Supreme Court divided on homelessness case that will impact California encampment policySupreme Court divided on homelessness case that will impact California encampment policyCalifornia cities are looking to the Supreme Court to win more authority to restrict homeless encampments.
Weiterlesen »



Render Time: 2025-03-14 00:14:46